• Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nice to see! Baby steps and all that. Getting RISC-V to a consumer-level state is still a pretty gargantuan task that has a lot of catch-up to do, but it’s walking along its path steadily.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If someone who makes ARM hardware wants to make a mainboard, I’d imagine Framework will work with them under the same conditions they’re working with DeepComputing on the RISC-V one.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        From what I can see, arm Linux itself is still a very small market so I don’t see how a small company could work on it and make a profit from that. Maybe once it becomes more mainstream and there is a bigger demand for it, they would definitely consider it. I would rather have them focus on what they have and expand their production, cost and sales region at the moment.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          arm Linux itself is still a very small market

          • Android
          • Raspberry Pi and similar SBCs
          • data centers (someone linked AWS graviton)
          • Chromebooks

          The list goes on. Linux is well established on ARM, and outside proprietary software, pretty much everything works on it. Desktop linux has been ready on ARM for over a decade, and people would buy it if it existed in a decent laptop.

          If Framework can source decently fast ARM chips and board for a decent cost, people will buy then, myself included. If they include a trackpoint and physical mouse buttons (esp middle mouse button), I’d replace my Thinkpad today even if it’s still on x86.

          There’s demand for it today, it’s just probably in the thousands instead of millions.

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If ARM is a small market, RISC-V is even smaller.

          I personally like when boundaries are pushed, and welcome more independence on x86.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, but there’s no license fees for RISC-V, so they need to sell less volume to be profitable.

  • mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can someone shut up the edgy guys trying to play Nostradamus? Go play with your x86 and overpriced nvidia RTX cards that you use only to run one lame game. People building the future don’t care about your prejudices.

      • mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Discourse is inaudible in the replies because users assumes things they don’t know shit about. I asked them to check the manufacturers video for fact checking but they continue spouting nonsense. At one point I wondered if some are not AI trolls.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The NT kernel is built on top of a hardware abstraction layer, which should make it easier to port it to different architectures.

      It's a neat kernel, shame about the Windows on top of it.