• Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My understanding is that they were embryos from HIV infected parents, so they had very little chance of avoiding infection during birth. His argument is that their chances of survival were already so low, there’s little harm that could be done if the treatment wasn’t effective.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel the need to point out that almost no babies get HIV from their mother as long as the mother is being successfully treated with anti retroviral medication.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thanks, I wasn’t aware of the circumstances. It puts stuff in a different perspective.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The linked Wikipedia article says only their fathers were HIV-positive, and typically that wouldn’t lead to a parent infecting their child unless they decided to share needles etc.