• wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Whoever dismantles the pre-existing structure will be the one who will have the chance to rebuild it. This is the entire reason they are doing it. Great if you share their vision. Not so much if you don’t.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      will be the one who will have the chance to rebuild it

      Assuming they have any intention of rebuilding it.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      will be the one who will have the chance to rebuild it

      Assumingbthey have any intention of rebuilding it.

      • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 days ago

        What a shit take. Not all change is good change, and if you think this will be a good change, boy do I have some great ocean front property in Colorado to sell you.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, my preference for government is to not change. Enforce the laws we have efficiently, and don’t bother me too much. Big changes carry a lot of (usually) subtle carveouts for special interests.