• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    We already have solar powered carbon sequestration systems, that require almost no maintenance over a period of a couple of hundred of years of operational life…

    Trees.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Until they burn or rot and release the carbon back into the air

      Also trees only grow where trees grew in the past, so growing new forests will only capture the carbon that was released when the ops forest there was burnt or cut

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Decomp still sequesters carbon.

        Sure, burning them releases a portion back, but not most of it…

        What do you think comprises ash?

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you want to capture the most of the carbon, you cook the wood in an oxygen free environment turning it to charcoal and liberating volatile components (which could be used as carbon neutral fuel to run the furnaces)

          Nothing can eat charcoal, so it could be stored cheaply