r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Anything before the GameCube, PS2, and Original Xbox.

    So PS1, Sega Saturn, and Nintendo64 and older are “retro.”

    The Atari 2600 and Colecovision are “vintage.”

    Pong and the Magnavox Odyssey are “antique.”

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Original Xbox, GameCube, PS2, Dreamcast - “old.”

        PS3, Xbox 360, Wii - “modern.”

        PS4, Xbox One - “previous gen”

        PS5, Xbox Series - “current gen”

        Nintendo Switch - “2015 smartphone”

        • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          But the PS3 / 360 are coming up to 20 years old. Hell, one of my adult colleagues was born after the 360 was released. Can they really be considered modern anymore?