This one is both upsetting and weird.

So there was a user on ponder.cat who’s been spamming posts. Like a lot. 58 per day, on average. Not 58 comments. 58 posts.

I started seeing a little scattering of reports about it, mostly just figured it was the mods’ business to deal with, and then finally today I actually really took a look at what they were doing and realized it was way over the top. Pretty much everyone in the comments agreed when someone brought it up.

A 25 day old account with 1,400+ posts? What the actual fuck? My entire goddamn feed is this one account…

Touch grass. Good lord. You’re carpet bombing multiple communities with repeats of the same crap.

The user was not receptive.

lol.

I guess people here do not know how to block an account.

:)

Is that a compliment or a rant?

May I introduce you to Lemmy block function.

If you don’t like my posts then block me and you will never see them again. As simple as that.

That’s a bunch of bullshit. The voting was about as you would expect. I said to the user:

That’s not how it works. If you’re interfering with the average Lemmy user’s experience, you don’t get to claim it doesn’t count because each individual person would be able to block each individual problematic account, if they wanted to have a good experience. Honestly, these people have a point. You have been posting an average of 58 posts per day. That’s too much. I post a ton, and that’s about 10 times more than me, and I’ve gotten multiple complaints about posting too much in particular communities. The handful of times it’s happened, my reaction was “Oh my bad what sounds like an acceptable level” and then to more or less stick to an acceptable level. Getting snarky with people who are asking you to cool it is very bad. Please stop posting so much. Anything about 10-15 posts per day starts to feel really excessive to me. Definitely don’t be dismissive about people’s complaints to you about it.

They rejected my suggestion, so I sent them a DM that was a little more direct about it: Stop doing this if you want to keep your account on my instance.

Then, for some reason, they deleted their account on their own.

Well, that was weird, but at least it’s all resolved and we can all get back to what we were doing. Or wait… what’s happening now?

I wasn’t expecting “making sure we make a safe space for the spammers by banning people who complain about spam” to be an important moderation duty, but I guess in the bizarro world that is !news@lemmy.world moderation philosophy, it makes perfect sense.

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1347

@Ghyste@sh.itjust.works

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s nothing wrong with posting as much as you want, as long as the moderators are willing to accept your posts and don’t reject them.

    This is a super weird and authoritarian philosophy.

    I get where you’re coming from, but imagine “There’s nothing wrong with posting Nazi content, as long the moderators are willing to accept your posts et cetera.”

    See how insane that sounds? The moderators can be wrong. The users can be wrong. Everyone has their judgements, but the idea that it’s appropriate for people to become totally passive in the face of whatever the moderators decide, even if it is irritating them or seems wrong, because the space “belongs” to the moderators to do what they want with it, and the users need to leave if they don’t like that, is some bullshit.

    IDK how this type of thinking crept into the internet. It didn’t used to be here.

    It might be true, as a practical matter, that the moderators have control over their spaces. That doesn’t mean that by definition there is “nothing wrong” with what they are doing with it. That’s the whole point of this community here.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      on the contrary it sounds insane to equate “posting with high volume” with “posting Nazi content” as though that’s a fair example you can use toward your argument at all

      “people who post a lot are basically Nazis” ??? hello? lmao

      if they are posting content that shouldn’t be there, report it. if the mods disagree, start a petition or encourage a migration. if you still can’t make change, use the block button. it’s really actually easy lol

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Okay, sure.

        “There’s nothing wrong with posting ads for your home supplement company, which everyone hates, as long as you cleared it with the mods first and they said it was okay.”

        That one’s probably a more accurate analogy.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          so did that actually happen? and if so why would you complain about it as a volume issue and not a self advertising issue?

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I am pointing out that the central conceit of their message – apparently, that nothing a user does can ever be wrong, as long as the mods are okay with it – is weird and incorrect. By way of some amplified versions and other situations where the same logic would lead to an absurd outcome.

            Obviously, a poster can be posting too much, even if the mods are okay with it. That’s the whole point of this community, is to second-guess the judgement of the mods.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              here you seem to equate “users can post at a high volume if they follow the other rules” with “nothing the user does can ever be wrong” which NO one ever said

              i hope the absurdity of this is innately apparent lol