• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    They shifted to a paid subscription model and fucked over any goodwill they had. Yeah they were major contributors to open source, but we gave them clemency because we didn’t think they’d position themselves to fuck us over so eagerly. Had we known, we wouldn’t have made so many downstream distros from them.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When was RHEL non-sub? I’m guessing you’re thinking of the code availability change, or maybe centos? Or are you literally thinking of the RH and not RHEL?

      Yeah they were major contributors to open source

      Still are.

      Had we known, we wouldn’t have made so many downstream distros from them.

      I remember rocky, alma, oracle, and Amazon. 2 of those are now upstream, 2 are still downstream (and only 1 wasn’t corpo backed).

      Alternatively they might not have made that change if people weren’t literally repacking their product and trying to steal their market share by giving it away for free with cheaper enterprise support. Imagine telling that to a room of rich shareholders.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        You can’t jump on an already successful FOSS product, make large changes to it under an extremely copy-left license free for all to use, and then turn around and claim that people are stealing your lunch.

        In the world of business where everyone claims to have bootstrapped their products out of thin air? Sure, use that Looney tunes logic.

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I agree with you, but we aren’t corpo assholes. And those changes were allowed under that extremely copy-left license.