• jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s typical for tech companies to organize as nonprofits and then restructure because they are losing cash?

      Not sure if I’m misunderstanding you or what part you think is typical

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s typical for tech companies to reorganize because they are losing cash, yes.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    So now we are actually to the point where we can ask if a corporation or more widely anything at all has any value if it makes no profit.

    There are people in the world who by luck of birth or circumstance have amassed obscene wealth and they after the fact are trying to convince everyone that profit is the only thing of value. These are the real public enemies.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Altman has since said the company is losing money on its $200-per-month Pro subscriptions, which offer limitless access to its most recent model, OpenAI o1, and to its video generator, Sora AI. “People use it much more than we expected,” he wrote in a post on X.

      It’s ridiculous. More people use the product, so they’re losing money? What. That’s the complete opposite of what a business is.

      Not to mention the environmental damage they’ve been doing for close to no positive results.

      • nolefan33@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s not more people using the product, it’s the limited population who are paying $200/month use it way more than they thought they would. So the costs per person paying that are going way over $200/month. Basically, they made the mistake of setting a fuck off price that was too low and a bunch of people did the math and took them up on the offer.

        • dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          If the product costs that much to run, and most users aren’t abusing their access, it’s possible the product isn’t profitable at any price that enough users are willing to pay.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            This is dumb. Moore’s law may be mostly dead, but chips are still progressing at an absurd pace. In 6 years you’ll be able to run the o1 model on a raspberry Pi with no internet access.