ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1external-linkWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·13 hours agoCounterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study. In other words, well, science.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoBecause of the implication.
Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.
In other words, well, science.
Because of the implication.