The title is err, not correct because the top 2 alternatives Opera and Arc are based on Chromium engine. I have seen tons of people swear by Arc, but I am seriously asking (since as a Linux user I can’t use it), how much good can a browser be in this day and age if ultimately it’s ad blocking breaks and it will since Manifest v2 will go soon(unless Arc folks have a solution for it)

The rest alternatives are Firefox, Zen (FF fork but honestly Atleast this was something new I learned from this article) and Tor (which is weird since it is not meant for normal web browsing and using it will not only be slow but put additional strain on the nodes, correct me if I am wrong).

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Except your data not being safe with Brave doesn’t depend on who owns it. It’s a technical conclusion that should follow from technical traits of a system. Those are such that using a modern web browser to do modern web things is not secure period.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Always has been.

      Right beside the fact that their monetary model relies on user activity tracking. Yet they advertise privacy.

      A browser that had a seemingly unlimited budget for advertising before it even had users is suspicious as hell.

      I’ve never trusted brave.

    • Darken@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This list to me feels like AI trying to average the commoner internet

      And the comments here really show it

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Eww opera, at least it’s slightly better than opera gx

    Edit: TOR? I stopped treating this guy seriously once I read this. Nobody uses TOR for regular browsing. They’re full of shit.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I tried Opera GX because it advertised the ability limit RAM consumption, and then I found out that the lowest it could go was 1GB which was not as low as I wanted.

    • natch@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Honestly I wish Kagi would build their own full Firefox fork and maintain it independently. I already pay for search, I wouldn’t mind paying for my browser if it actually respected me!

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hm…not sure, if I want to support another Webkit browser

      We need more diversity in web engines

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ironically, I could not reach the end of the list because the fucking ads kept reloading the page and scrolling me to the top. Anyone know which of these 6 would block that?

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of that list, Zen is the only one really worth considering. And then you have the “but the best one that supports widevine” issue.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Firefox can do so too with TST or one of the other extensions in the store. Sometimes(atleast for me), they introduce slightly more lag when opening the browser but otherwise, they can do much of the job. I use Tree Style Tabs even though I might not be a power user of it (read:not actively using every nitty gritty of the extension).

      • RexWrexWrecks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I agree. I’m a pretty happy Firefox user. I am not a power-user of tabs anyway, I try to keep my open tabs to a minimum.

  • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I didn’t see Waterfox mentioned in the article or comments, so I’m giving it a shout out now. Firefox is still my #1 browser, which I have synced to all my critical accounts, and use very cautiously, only using a few trustwothy extensions. However, when I want to explore unfamiliar domains or experiment with lesser-known browser extensions, I’ve relied on the equally dependable Waterfox browser. It’s fast, free, and 99% the same as Firefox except it’s a completely different app so you can basically have 2 Firefoxes set up and customized for completely different roles. Between the two, I can keep Chrome frozen on my phone and off my desktop (although I have a portable Chromium on USB for emergencies).

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      You do know Firefox has profiles you can use to effectively make it two (or more) separate browsers?

      Not shitting on Waterfox, just FYI.

      • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do, and have used them in the past. However I’ve had issues with the profiles getting corrupted. Could be user error ;) Installing Waterfox was easier than trying to sort out my profiles.ini and so as you know, nothing is more permanent than a temporary fix :D

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have Waterfox setup as an alternative browser but it does not have much stuff to differentiate itself from mainstream FF, as you said.

    • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Firefox sync works on all Firefox forks (I’m using LibreWolf on Linux and Fennec on Android for example)

  • milk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Its actually pretty important that some normal traffic does flow through tor. If you dont mind the speed then its perfectly okay* to do all your web browsing through tor

    *there are some caveats here but its not about the network really

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anyone have any thought on Orion? I know it lets you use chrome and Firefox extensions and safari/macos features. Is this the right direction or a triple hitter of danger?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          If they make a flatpak available, I’ll give it a shot.

          Linux

          Found this link.

          GitHub

          Org here. They have four repos:

          • Notes - readme and a license, no code
          • iOS app open - blank readme
          • DarkMode - <30 line script
          • Programmable buttons - random macOS-specific XML files, no actual code

          I hope that changes, but for now their repo is essentially empty.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Chrome is not the same thing as Chromium.

    ITT: people who like to argue about all manner of things except whether or not Chrome and Chromium are the same thing.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Its as good as. when Google decides to remove manifest v2 support, it is removed from chromium, right?

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It removes it from Chromium, but there’s nothing stopping them from manually adding it back before releasing it. Though it would be a lot of work.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Putting aside whether it’s “as good as”, it’s still not.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ok. But what’s the problem with chrome right now? They’re killing ad block. But they’re not actually, chromium is.

          So anytime someone says “I’m leaving chrome because they suck for killing ad block” they mean “I’m leaving chromium because they suck for killing ad block”.

          Does that clarification help then?

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            There is no clarification required. Nothing you said indicates that Chrome = Chromium.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I switched from Firefox to Floorp and haven’t looked back. Less bloated, same features, haven’t found an extension that isn’t compatible yet.

    Same with Fennec on Android.

    This article is pretty poor overall. Why recommend Arc, a browser that requires a user account to even open a webpage, and which the author himself said will probably be disappearing in the near future as part of their own product strategy?

    Lame clickbait aimed at nobody.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thanks Fennec I use, I haven’t tried Mull yet. Sounds dumb but I’m constantly looking for Android FF forks so I can use them for other profiles. Really wish mobile FF would get proper profile support.

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Have you tried Firedragon? Floorp-based but with some eye candy and privacy enhancements. (Linux only at the moment)

    • jef@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Floorp is a nightmare from my experience, I’ve tried it about 2 years ago, it was pretty cool but insanely buggy, I’ve been trying it maybe once every 2 months ever since and it hasn’t gotten better IMO, if you customize almost anything in the ui, things will break eventually, and I always get frequent freezes and crashes.

      At this point I just use Firefox with Betterfox user.JS and its been great, you get ff updates as fast as they come out since it’s not a frok, also has all bloat and telemetry disabled, whenever I try out another browser I just switch back to ff for one reason or another.

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wonder if floorp has improved, because people are talking it up lately. My experience a few months ago was like yours, it was very buggy.

        • jef@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Last I’ve tried it was about a week ago, it was as I described. FYI I am on a mac, so Linux/windows might be less buggy, not sure.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve been using it on Linux for months and have had zero issues. FIrefox, on the other hand, constantly crashes. When it even opens in the first place.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I haven’t had many bugs but I’m primarily using it on a MacBook, so maybe it’s more stable than on Linux? Though that in itself would also be a bother as I have a Linux desktop that I want to install on, so I’ll be looking out for these issues when I do.

      • Clot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        For me, librewolf focuses too much on privacy sacrificing features, I personally dont like zen’s design. There’s others like waterfox but didnt tried them

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It sounded on base value like the least effort when switching from Firefox. It basically came down to Floorp and LW. I tried the former first and didn’t see a need to continue looking.

    • trueheresy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is interesting as I’ve not even heard of Floorp and alternatives have been such a hot topic the last month between manifest v3 and firefoxes updated terms fiasco.

      Can I ask, what for you had you opt for floorp vs the more commonly mentioned alternatives like Librewolf, Waterfox, etc.?

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        It sounded like the easiest migration from FF, and I tried it first out of the options I had lined up to consider (inc. LibreWolf). I expect LW is great too, but I’m time poor and until Floorp gives me a reason to switch, I’ll stick with it.

      • aqua_cat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        I at least switched to Floorp for more customization options and funny name, but back then Floorp also had vertical tabs and side-dock before any other Firefox fork (afaik).

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      As someone who used Opera 2002-2013 (Presto era), I quibble with the “always”.

      But I do not quibble with the “is”.

        • klu9@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, me too. Never used it since.

          So I was glad when Opera co-founder von Tetzchner announced Vivaldi, and I did use it for a couple of years. But I don’t want to become dependent on something not completely FLOSS, so lately using mainly Firefox mods like Floorp, Zen and Firedragon.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            My history w/ browsers:

            1. IE - everyone started here
            2. Firefox - switched once I heard about it
            3. Chrome - when it came out, it was fast, which was cool
            4. Opera - switched as soon as I heard about it; was about as fast as Chrome
            5. Firefox - switched when Opera became a Chromium browser

            Since I came from old IE days and started my career having to backport stuff to IE, I care a lot about engine competition, because IE owning everything made everything worse. So that’s still my #1 concern today, hence why I use Firefox.

            I do dabble with Firefox forks though. I use Fennec on my phone, am trying out Mullvad on my laptop, etc. But I’m going to stay within the Gecko-family of browsers until a viable alternative to Blink (Chrome’s engine) emerges (e.g. Servo or LadyBird).

    • Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yep. Dont use Opera. They are known for being an incredibly scummy company that has done illegal things. Im 98% sure opera gx is spyware

    • wedge@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was an excellent standalone install porn browser for a couple of decades. God seed Opera… God speed.

    • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I beg to differ, when Opera had its own engine and wasn’t Chinese owned - back in the early '00s.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Opera was so good. Disable images, force custom CSS, gestures! Stuff no one else had at the time.

          • philpo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            And it has some options to interpret data following strict W3C standards. Which was incredibly helpful when learning, as it encouraged me (and a lot of others) to don’t go down the IE/Netscape and later Chrome “specialities” road. (Yes,I am that old…I still remember MS fucking FrontPage)

        • WFH@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          gestures!

          Still the reason that 20+ years later the second thing I install on any browser is a gestures extension (the first one is always uBlock Origin, obviously).

      • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah I was 100% Opera on desktop and mobile until they switched to chromium and broke everything from before. Still pissed about that, lost all my bookmarks and notes at one point.

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Opera also was a good alternative on Symbian phones right or whatever OS Nokia used before they switched to Windows Phone, I think.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Opera mini was also great when I had very little MBs of internet traffic in my plan. Nowadays I have pretty much infinite traffic, so I haven’t used it in ages

          • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I think I remember Opera Mini’s layout though I didn’t much use it. It was a great alternative especially on mobile more than a decade back.

            But yes especially after changing ownership, switching browser engines and years down the line; things have changed.

            I think I gave their desktop variant a try sometime ago but didn’t find it compelling enough. I haven’t even used their Android fork. I keep using a Firefox fork only :p.

        • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I suspect that we may be looking back with rose tinted glasses, but the main stream internet is pretty crap atm

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Many sites have become worse. I think stuff like Cnet, PCMag (which still has a digital magazine I think)were much better in the previous era.