data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c06be/c06be5bb6f5b99e53665fb49347556e4b2e997ac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/601f3/601f389cc0c7bdcde54a8133bebb83c942d8981e" alt=""
Oh yes because immigrating to a different country is such an easy task
Oh yes because immigrating to a different country is such an easy task
Oof, hell no. That’s some Facebook level cancer right there when they removed downvotes.
It’s just a form of white washing that makes the same people who made up being offended by “black lists” and “master branch”.
Is there a record of these collated somewhere?
After nearly a year of Kagi. It’s actually painful when I’m on a device with just Google.
Would recommend if you are a knowledge worker or researcher, or just in a technical field.
It’s really disingenuous to mud sling people with a different view by implying they themselves don’t exist/are astroturfing/are bots.
I’m a real human who decided to use their service for kicks and actually like some of the benefits and control over the results compared to other search engines.
Especially when I’m doing research, which is usually half of all my time searching anyways.
Enough that I decided to pay for the service. I’m happy with it and want to share that happiness with others. Are you saying that because I liked a service that I can’t seem to get anywhere else I’m now the bad guy? Because I like something and want to share it with others, that’s bad?
Is the alternative that you might prefer to be corporate astroturfing instead of organic discussion and growth? Like, really, seriously, what’s the alternative here if people talking about and sharing something they like is not acceptable?
Well if the votership has anything to do with it: something around 30 to 40% would happily volunteer that information.