cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25427659

Enjoy a RARE piece of original content from your’s truly, instead of a repost from deep in my dust-covered downloads folder

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukMEnglish
    132·
    8 hours ago

    I suppose the fun starts trying to slot other instances in there.

    So reply with an instance and thrash out it’s place on the graph.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netEnglish
        3·
        2 hours ago

        Arguably dbzer0 would be a bit further towards the libertarian right, although still in the bottom left corner.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.netEnglish
                1·
                1 hour ago

                “Libertarian socialism” is quite a bit broader than “ancom” and there are plenty of anarcho-individualists that out of individualist considerations consider themselves socialists.

                Lets take piracy as an example:

                An ancom would likely argue that this is bad under the current circumstances and that the creators should be fairly compensated or rather have their needs covered so that they are free to make stuff. However they would likely also concede that piracy from large corporations would be somewhat ok as large privately owned corporations are a bad thing and thus don’t deserve any protection.

                An anarcho-individualist would be likely in favour of piracy even under the current circumstances as it usually benefits the person pirating much more than it hurts the people working on the digital media, but maybe concede that you shouldn’t do it for small individual creators trying to make a living.

                So you see that the final outcome isn’t that different, but an ancom would likely shy away from openly promoting piracy of digital media.

                • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                  1·
                  1 hour ago

                  Wouldn’t an ancom not believe in ownership — and therefore think piracy is not inherently immoral? Obviously they believe in community distribution and mutual aid so they would believe that if people involved with the creation of those media were struggling they would help those people, but not necessarily through the proxy of buying the movie but through general mutual aid.

                  • poVoq@slrpnk.netEnglish
                    1·
                    55 minutes ago

                    Hence my “under current circumstances” where people do need to make a living under capitalist conditions. But indeed neither would consider it immoral in terms of ownership, especially since digital media has a duplication cost near zero.