![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I suppose they’re both highly charged and make specific points with the goal of providing illuminated information
Thanks
Am in the UK so am safe from that for the time being…
I find it’s more often than not ‘heavyweight’ texts, especially on history articles where really really niche researchers have books or papers on the matter. That’s useful. But I’m generally more after what a professor would assign first year students as an introduction to The Romantics or English Painters. Sometimes Wikipedia has that, sometimes it has “Brush techniques employed by Turner in the summer of 1798 by Prof George Bannister, Prof Rodger Walker et al.”
Pretty much what I do. Sometimes I find the list isn’t public or the course is more niche than in interested in.
Thank you, never seen that before
People who thought Tyler Durden was cool
Almost everything about Starship Troopers
people who think Bickle (Taxi Driver) is a hero
Probably because many pop science articles will mention that the background radiation of the universe is at about 2-3 degrees above absolute zero. Plus things like the night side of mars being freezing, pluto being a frozen rock, comets being made of ice etc…