If you distribute your app via Flatpak, what benefit is there over “disk space” (irrelevant for all but embedded devices)
Everyone always focuses on disk space, but IMO the real issue is download size, especially when you update a bunch of flatpaks together.
I still prefer the upstream flatpaks over Fedora’s though.
Well, but then you’re basically just pushing the mutability onto the container
That’s the point, when programming with immutable structures you always pass the mutability onto the enclosing structure.
It’s a good strategy at times though. Like say you’re working in a language where strings are immutable and you want a string you can change. You can wrap it in a list along the lines
s=['foo']and pass references to the list around instead. Then if you gos[0]='bar'at some point, all the references will now see['bar']instead.
A list is an antipattern here IMO. Just wrap it in some dedicated object (see e.g. Java’s StringBuilder).
What you need here is not the stability in memory (i.e. of pointers, which you lose when you recreate an object) but instead just the stability of an identifier (e.g. the index into a list).
The only options you have are:
Dazn Standard (45€/month, 35€/month if you pay for 12 months) to get access to all the SerieA matches (and a whole bunch of other sports nobody cares about)
Dazn Goal Pass (20€/month, 14€/month if you pay for 12 months) to get access to 3 SerieA matches per week which you don’t get to choose (and a bunch of other sports nobody cares about)
Sky (16€/month for the first 18 months, then whatever Sky wants after that) to get access to 3 SerieA matches per week which you don’t get to choose (and a bunch of other stuff nobody cares about)
Most people care only about some specific matches, so your only option is Dazn.
Dazn is also a very crappy service, it often has connectivity problems and also has ads. Fun fact, if you get a connection issue while watching a Dazn ad, it will restart.
So, as usual, monopoly, high costs and crappy services drive piracy.