![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Common laws is dynamic, subject to interpretation and serves often to fill gaps in legislation.
Common Law is simply a principle that similar judicial findings are binding for future cases. Whilst US, UK, South Africa, Canada etc. Are all common law countries, the application and interpretation of common law is by no means consistend and the US has diverged the furthest from the English tradition.
So whilst a traditional common law principle may be alive in law, it may also have been modified by a combination of contemporary judicial findings and legislative intervention.
To be clear, historic English common law principles may not be as persuasive or binding to US judicial findings. However, the US absolutely is a Common Law jurisdiction, see eg [1]
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/lawschool/pre-law/intro-to-american-legal-system.page#%3A~%3Atext=The+American+system+is+a%2Cof+the+matter+before+it. ↩︎