data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28715/287158e4c4b28c15489dac3620e598b90d912b36" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae47f/ae47f8ed8e6793aeac6698579b80f946337064b6" alt=""
That’s weird, because marvel writing was almost constant one liners. And the joke option is one of three for every decision. But, yeah w/e
That’s weird, because marvel writing was almost constant one liners. And the joke option is one of three for every decision. But, yeah w/e
Can someone explain to me why people think DA:V is bad? I’m thoroughly enjoying the game, I picked it up this last month, and haven’t seen any issue with it. The only thing I can think of is the vocal minority neckbeard gamers complaining about LGBTQ+ narratives… that their character relationship decisions directly influenced their exposure to.
There’s another one listed here in this post about accepting federal funding for road management. Even if the state were to resist, Trump would then withhold federal funding for… everything if needed. To include road maintenance.
Limiting interstate travel, is the argument I’m hearing. The tolls are (currently) being taken at the borders into other states, is what they’re saying.
I have not, and I was wondering if that was the case.
Griping (giving it negative reviews) about it not being the same as prior iterations, even though it’s a perfectly adequate and fun game sounds like nitpicking a little to me. Sure, it may not be 5/5 for returning fans, but review bombing a perfectly good game because you wanted or expected something else seems a little much.