Surveillance is the obvious purpose of any robot dog.

I’ll leave this comment on their behalf,

o.m.g… is OP that unable?

why does that change what OP was asking?

No.

I do not change the question, I just tell my answer.

Tldr all the rest for good.

The market crash is a symptom.

A possible world war is another symptom.

IMHO both have the same cause, but they are not the cause for each other.

I’m starting to hate the code

That’s an excellent situation for change.

The actor who had only bad films.

There are still some films worth looking.

But will there be any then?

say universally the same avitar is applied to everyone while on trial.

The one and only “good” AI. Trustworthy for everybody?

I do not believe in that.

First you would need to decide on the one and only company to provide that AI. Then someone must prove that it is good and only good. Then it must be unhackable (and remain so while technology evolves).

All of this is hardly feasable.

the only thing that’s attempted to be bypassed, are biases related to his appearence and speech.IMO this concept could be the real future of trials if done right.

How do you know if it is done right or wrong?

It is fake, and it is a manipulative kind of fake.

You assume some honorable purpose, but that isn’t the only possible purpose.

Even “bypassing biases” would be a kind of manipulation, and you can never know what other manipulation is going on at the same time. It could exploit other biases. It could try other tricks that we are not evil enough to imagine, and it would be “better” at it than any real human.

About 10, I guess.

No, I am not rich (in money). They are just near.

not see any measurable awareness growth

How do you measure awareness?

And how do you watch it grow?