It’s some right winger platform

Unless you get one of the day’s 10’000, it’ll be recognised by any tech people.

With color spaces we’re talking about standards like sRGB, Rec.2020 and many more. Wikipedia Article

If a video comes with information on the color space it uses, the video player and compositor can now do a more source accurate mapping to your screen than before.

If you also have an ICC profile for your monitor, you’ll get the most out of your panel now. Without that, the compositor will assume an sRGB calibration (when not using HDR) and do its best to map a higher definition video to that.

That’s why you shouldn’t Frankenstein it

Arch is simple, but not easy.
Other distros might be easy, but not simple

Yes

https://regex101.com/r/h5XOd0/1

Where did you get that “RFC standard” regex? It doesn’t allow domain names with one component RFC5321

Neither does it allow spaces in quoted string, as per RFC5322

This, 👋@✉️.gg, is already a working email address in most clients and if RFC6532 ever gets accepted, it would be officially recognized as such.

My point isn’t to make your regex bad, just that it doesn’t validate or invalidate an email properly. Nothing stops me from giving you and invalid but syntactically correct email after all.
You have to send an email anyways to verify, so the most you can check is the presence of one @ symbol.

That’s not something you can determine using a regex.

“user@com” for example could be a perfectly working email.

The right way is to send a verification email in every case.

I was about to ruin your day by finding a valid email address that would be rejected by your regex, but it doesn’t even parse correctly on regex101.com

The only valid regex for email is .+@.+ btw

I usually do

# What we are doing (high level)
# Why we need regex
# Regex step by step
# Examples of matches
regex

And I still rewrite it the next time

Next Proton if they enable full Wayland support

Got two notifications this morning where I was tagged in an issue, but just a few minutes later when I tried to view the report it was already gone.
Really, props to the Codeberg moderation team for their hard work.