Btw, you can embedd the image like that:

![Someday ImageMagick will finally break for good and we'll have a long period of scrambling as we try to reassemble civilization from the rubble.](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/dependency.png)

It will look like that:

Zionism is nationalism. Mearly calling it a right to self-determination is disengenious.

On the other hand I agree that implying an equality between Zionism and Nazism (as in the facist ideoligy) downplays the severity of facism and the Holocaust in particular.

Fair, I did not know individuals could not be persecuted based on the GG alone (although there seems to be some nuance on this with “mittelbare Drittwirkung” which implies that the GG should be considered even when a matter is between two private individuals, but I don’t think that is too relevant here)

Wrote it down in another comment in case you might actually care you can read it there:

https://feddit.org/comment/4798706

So that means its ok to violate it? Like what is your argument there?

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__130.html

(1) Anyone who, in a manner that is likely to disturb the public peace,

1. incites hatred against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group, against sections of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of the aforementioned group or a section of the population, or incites violence or arbitrary measures, or
2. attacks the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously denigrating or defaming a designated group, sections of the population or an individual because of their membership of a designated group or a section of the population,

shall be liable to a custodial sentence of three months to five years.

And according to https://kujus-strafverteidigung.de/strafrecht/volksverhetzung/ the protected groups include

Gruppen mit einer bestimmten weltanschaulichen Überzeugung (Groups with a certain view or conviction)

Which one could concievably put Nazis into (although their views are shit they’re still views)

https://www.anwalt.org/volksverhetzung/#absatz-1-nr-1-stoerung-des-oeffentlichen-friedens-durch-aufruf-zu-hass-und-gewalt Further provides the following explanation for attacks against human dignity:

Dem Täter kommt es aus verwerflichen Beweggründen darauf an, andere Menschen als besonders minderwertig, unwürdig und verachtenswert darzustellen. (For reprehensible motives, the perpetrator aims to portray other people as particularly inferior, unworthy and despicable.)

I would think saying someones live does not matter constitutes them as unworthy (of life).

NewNewSouthWales(final)(1).odt