data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a0d0/4a0d0ebd365e70861823b46803f4900d91817662" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd89d/fd89d60f281bc5b809b177d43f1fc4e389d2c82a" alt=""
2·
6 days agoOh interesting. I just saw it was recently updated so I went with it. I’ll have to look into what’s going on with it though.
Thanks for the Thunder suggestion. This thing seems really solid.
Oh interesting. I just saw it was recently updated so I went with it. I’ll have to look into what’s going on with it though.
Thanks for the Thunder suggestion. This thing seems really solid.
Wait what happened with Raccoon? I recently switched to it after finally giving up on the Sync dream.
This is a fun little rehash of the “what naming scheme should I use for my servers” discussion that will never end.
I agree, I use fun cutesy shit as aliases and whatnot but actual hostnames are boring and logical.