![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/0369942a-29fe-4b84-ad6b-a96db98db021.jpeg)
Well according to the movie what you’re saying can make perfect sense.
Well according to the movie what you’re saying can make perfect sense.
That sounds amazing. I’d give my left arm to be ambidextrous.
I get what you’re saying but film critics don’t rate for enjoyment or suitability in some situations but for the quality of the film.
The Cannes film probably is objectively better as a work of cinematic art and worthy of the 9.2 score whereas your lazy Sunday afternoon flick is a 6.8.
If you’re feeling lazy and don’t want to think much then pick whatever because that critic rating says nothing about the enjoyment value of the film.
It’s like restaurants. No-one is going to argue that a Michelin star restaurant isn’t a more refined experience than the pizza shop down the street. But 90% of the time you’d prefer a pizza. But celebrating a 40th birthday, let’s go fancy.
What are you on about? The first paragraph says hash tables are “widely used” and the second says they are “common”.
“Data structures called hash tables” seems to just be a factual statement of what we’re dealing with, especially for people who are not programmers.