

I didn’t claim “everything NATO ever did is good”, nothing meets that standard. You’re the one still failing to prove they’re “pro-war” and dodged the question about Russia. Nice try vatnik.
I didn’t claim “everything NATO ever did is good”, nothing meets that standard. You’re the one still failing to prove they’re “pro-war” and dodged the question about Russia. Nice try vatnik.
Not sure why you’re including an exercise as “proof” of NATO being “pro-war” but ok. Especially one performed in response to Russian aggression. I do know why, it’s because you’re grasping at straws.
These missile strikes in Yemen weren’t NATO, and were a justified defense against attacks on cargo ships regardless.
And then a wikileaks link with nothing of substance.
So you’ve got nothing to justify such a ridiculous claim, even when given 20 years to go back to.
Do you think Russia is an aggressor/pro-war imperialistic country?
Not many things are the same as they were during the cold war, obviously.
Got anything in the past, say 20 years, that would validate your description? In terms of NATO’s actions, rather than vague hereditary claims?
In attempting to describe what NATO is, maybe try not to go all the way back to the cold war. NATO is a defensive alliance and a weaker NATO makes war more likely.
Feels like they’re turning more to fascism