• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    That is like saying the people in the US don’t elect the president because the Electoral College does.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I mean I’m definitely not with that Israeli bootlicking dude, but it’s genuinely pretty rare how the US does not have direct presidential elections, like most developed democracies.

      Luckily the states can sort of do away with it at anytime without a federal shit of any kind, by just promising to vote according to the popular vote. Many states have already done it imo

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Our shitty system was designed by the wealthy land owning elite to keep control over the elections by putting a wall between the voting public and the presidency that could override the popular vote and also give more power to the slave owning states that had a lower voting eligible population.

        It is a shit system that should have been replaced a long, long time ago.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I think John Oliver did a piece on how many states have signed a deal of some sorts saying their electors will always vote according to the popular vote, effectively removing the electoral college without any federal law change required.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            That doesn’t result in the popular vote matching the electoral college vote because the electoral college votes are not directly proportional to population and the margin of victory doesn’t matter.

            Small rural states have an outsized impact as long as a candidate has a plurality of the votes. Something like 25% of the total national votes is all that is needed to win the presidency in the most extreme case. That is how the Republicans have won the presidency without the popular vote twice in the last few decades.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, not at all. The US electorate votes on a Presidential candidate that the electoral college selects. Israel does not vote for a specific leader. Are you unaware how parliamentary elections work because it seems like you have zero clue.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        The people vote for the members of parliment that vote for the PM.

        Are you unable to understand the obvious comparison?

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Which means the people are not choosing Bibi and it is entirely possible that many/most voted for other parties.

          Do you not get that your claim just makes zero sense in parliamentary electoral systems? I get that you hate Israel but at least make informed claims.