• brianary@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The moratorium is actually since 2000, but only since 2006 in its current form. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_use_restriction_technology

    Thankfully, no country, much less any multinational corporation, would ever dare cross the UN’s nonbinding, unenforceable moratorium. Can you imagine how stern the tone of the statement of condemnation would be, once it was worded such that a reasonable plurality of countries would agree to back it?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sure it’s already been done. Just locked away until nothing more than strong concerns can be voiced by ineffective authorities.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    GMO skepticism or not, Monsanto is one of the most evil companies in the world and a perfect example of what makes the profit motive such an inefficient organizer of production and distribution

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They make more money suing farmers for accidentally growing patented crops from natural seed dispersal mechanisms.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m the guy on the left just because until for-profit corporations are reigned in I don’t trust them with control of anything.

  • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Does anyone else feel like this entire post and most of the comments are coming straight from a Monsanto bot/shill factory?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’ve never been on reddit? If someone mentions Monsanto anywhere, the thread gets flooded with shills. There are whole subreddits devoted to finding posts to shill.

  • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’re not sterile, but they will sue you if they find you’ve been growing seeds from last year’s crops.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t think they’ve successfully sued anyone for that. The few cases I saw last time I looked people were intentionally germinating or saving/selling seeds.

        • ADKSilence@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          So uhh… hypothetically if one were to live next to a cornfield and acquire some seeds from said field cough somehow cough, would those purely hypothetical seeds grown in one’s garden then constitute corn piracy?

          Asking for a friend of course.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      No they won’t.

      They will sue you if you take your neighbors pesticide resistant seeds, sow them, douse them in pesticide so only the resistant ones survive, and sow your entire field with them.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Classic piracy. The original product is still there; you’re just making a copy.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean, I totally agree with all forms of breaking IP law on ethical grounds. But I also recognise that it’s still breaking the law right now.

          • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            You getting downvoted for stating what’s factually correct while still disagreeing with it is classic shooting the messenger.

              • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                I have read these receipts and literally the first story is about Percy Schmeiser, a farmer who used seed from plants grown on his own land that had been “contaminated” with genes from a neighboring farm. He had never signed any contract with Mansanto and didn’t take the seeds from his neighbor. Plants on his property were “contaminated” through natural means.
                It then ends with a brief note about 700 farmers who settled out of court and lumps them under the guilty umbrella because they settled.
                But worst of all, this site that this article is posted on is a propaganda mouth piece for Monsanto. It is owned and funded by the same guy owns and funds Monsanto’s PR company.

                • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Sure, I don’t disagree. The difference is I had a source to criticize. You know what info I was working with and can guage how reasonable my claim is. If you go around to people convinced of something and say “Nuh uh”, it doesn’t matter if you’re correct, you’ll be laughed out of the room.