• waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mountain house and in pretty indifferent about the hot tub. I just want to be in the mountains.

  • xye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If we’re talking Pacific Ocean and no climate change yep that one hands down. No thanks to a pool, hot tubs can be fun but really just eh after a time. Beach is life man.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mountain House if solar/wind are feasible and I have sufficient clearing to grow my own food.

    Otherwise, regular house.

    I like mountains, hiking, biking, and I want to become self-sufficient where possible. And my wife wants cows and chickens, I don’t think they would do well on a beach, especially when sea levels start noticeably rising.

  • other_cat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If utilities and internet speed and stuff are a non-issue (all things are equal), mountain house.

    Otherwise, beach house.

    Honestly, I like swimming, but I’d rather have a normal ass house than have to deal with pool maintenance.

  • Rose56@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mountain house, more things to do(gardens etc) and of course relax.

  • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Mountain house with a hot tub. Then I don’t even need a bug out location for the upcoming civil war 👍

    Plus, I can get more animals and a bigger garden.

  • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The house with a pool if someone else would take care of the maintenance without me needing to worry about it. Otherwise the beach house, I would imagine it would be the easiest to rent out and use that income to get a house I would actually like.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t want a pool but of those choices I’ll take the pool. Don’t want to live in the middle of nowhere in the mountains, and I love the beach but the beach keeps shrinking, soon enough that’s not a house on the beach. Houses with pools all over here, it’s common enough so I guess insurable.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I want to live in a walkable, urban, area, so probably the beach house. Maybe down by Coney Island.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Im with the fedditor who said well only if hypothetical as likely all options are to expensive. Thing is that I would take the beach house as top except for sea level rise would put me off. Of course if Im super rich maybe I don’t care about having to buy a new place super soon. Next would be the mountain house but only if for some reason it was close enough to a city to have transit and stuff around, which is unlikely but maybe exists in colorado or something (same would apply to the beach house but I think its much more likely to have that in beach vs moutains). In all reality I would actually prefer the house or condo with a pool as it could likely be located in a nice city with good transit. Honestly I would prefer a great indoor hottub and sauna than the pool.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Whichever is easiest to get groceries to.

    I really wanted a cottage on an island in a lake in Ontario or Finland but getting food and stuff there is such a pain.