• RideAgainstTheLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The irony of using an AI generated image for this post…

    AI imagery makes any article look cheaper in my view, I am more inclined to “judge the book by its cover”.

    Why would you slap something so lazy on top of a piece of writing you (assuming it isn’t also written by AI) put time and effort into?

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I know that it’s a meme to hate on generated images people need to understand just how much that ship has sailed.

      Getting upset at generative AI is about as absurd as getting upset at CGI special effects or digital images. Both of these things were the subject of derision when they started being widely used. CGI was seen as a second rate knockoff of “real” special effects and digital images were seen as the tool of amateur photographers with their Photoshop tools acting as a crutch in place of real photography talent.

      No amount of arguments film purist or nostalgia for the old days of puppets and models in movies was going to stop computer graphics and digital images capture and manipulation. Today those arguments seem so quaint and ignorant that most people are not even aware that there was even a controversy.

      Digital images and computer graphics have nearly completely displaced film photography and physical model-based special effects.

      Much like those technologies, generative AI isn’t going away and it’s only going to improve and become more ubiquitous.

      This isn’t the hill to die on no matter how many upvoted you get.