• Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    What about gravity? I know I read something about this once, but is gravity also limited to the speed of light?

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    i mean, if the moon is up there, the light first has to bounce off of the moon, and then back to earth, so yes, it would most definitely take longer…

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I really doubt we would notice, because if so we would already be feeling different during day and night. The sun pulls us toward the sky during the daytime and toward the ground at night. Also toward the east at sunrise and the west at sunset. But none of this seems noticeable.

      • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        We are in “free fall” around the Sun so that’s why we don’t feel its pull of gravity.

        You would similarly feel weightless if you were in an orbit around Earth.

  • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    But not by much longer. People on the other side of the world or connected to satellites monitoring sunspots would notice pretty much immediately after the light ceases to reach the earth and would tell everyone else over the internet

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Wherever you live on the Earth’s surface starts cooling every night and gets warmed up again the next day. It wouldn’t cool any faster if the sun went away, it would just keep cooling at the normal rate until everything was frozen. But I doubt it would take more than a week or two, depending on where you live.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah, but that’s with petawatts being blasted on the other side of the earth every second, wouldn’t the loss of that make the whole system cool down faster, including the side the sun doesn’t touch? I’m thinking it’d be like having food on a hot plate, bottom is very hot, the top is less hot. But if you take the food off the plate the whole thing rapidly goes to room temp. I honestly have no idea, just conjecture tbh.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The only way to get the right answer would involve doing math and knowing enough climatology and geology to even know which math, so I dunno.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Atmosphere would hold the heat for a bit, the real issues will begin with food shortages because the crops won’t grow

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah but how long is a bit? Also, without the gravity center of our solar system, how long would it take for all the planets to start drifting off into the void?

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          A bit - probably weeks to months. For the second question - 8 minutes for the Earth, since gravity propagates at the speed of light

          • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            A bit - probably weeks to months.

            no lol
            It goes from 85 to 58 in 12 hours right now in reality world

            “A bit” = 1 day, and by the end of that day it’d be freezing (below freezing if you live in whiteistan)

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              The irony of the guy replying to you with PHD in his username not understanding that the Sun blasts the Earth with an absolutely unreal amount of energy

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I honestly think you’re forgetting the atmosphere and like, physical ground under our feet. It doesn’t generally drop to 0C overnight unless it’s already pretty close to 0C because of the heat trapped in the atmosphere and emanating from the earth’s core. It’s going to be more like a week for most places.

              • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I honestly think you’re forgetting the atmosphere and like, physical ground under our feet.

                no im not, you’re forgetting that the sun exists

                Max-Min temps (F) yesterday across 3 different continents:
                Lucknow 82-53
                Mandalay 90-67
                Kisangani 91-76
                Porto Velho 85-77

                Temps drop by 22 F at night (avg) around the equator. Most tropical land reaches freezing in 1.5 days if the sun vanishes. Forget temperate.

                Best case scenario is Tropical rainforest since water holds heat. Middle of Amazon gets “only” an 8 F (4.4 C) drop in 12 hours, so 3.3 days to reach freezing.

                keep in mind that these temp drops occur right now, in reality meatspace, despite “the atmosphere and like, physical ground under our feet”. (both of these exist)

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Actually, on second thoughts, this comment explicitly proves that you’re a reactionary hiding their lack of investigation behind accusations of immaterialism - just by applying your own logic to real world numbers, you’ve gone from a day to half a week. You have no place opining on this subject.

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah, you’ll notice that your “massive” 22°F is the difference between direct sunlight and no sunlight. Do you think there’s another sun to take away after the first one, to get rid of even more sunlight and drop the temperature another 22°?
                  Why don’t you believe that physical materials are capable of holding heat energy? Why did you latch on to atmosphere and ground instead of the biggest energy store on the planet, the ocean (you don’t need to answer that we know it’s because those are the ones I named)? Why do you think that the temperature difference between day and night - sunlight and no sunlight - is the same as the general rate at which energy is lost from the planet? Have you not ever been outside at night to discover the largest part of the temperature drop happens as soon as the sun disappears?

                  You’re doing a very good job of the typical liberal application of raw, familiar logic to a new situation, but the only part of it you actually understand is that the sun supplies lots of energy, and haven’t made it any further than that.

              • burgersc12@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                And the sun doesn’t generally blink out of existence. Think about how much energy is on the other side of the earth, it’s not like the two sides of earth are separate they are one huge interconnected energy system. What happens on one side impacts the other, and the core doesn’t provide enough energy and the atmosphere is leaking heat constantly

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You are also forgetting the atmosphere and ground (and oceans, of course) - It being one huge interconnected energy system is exactly why I’m saying it would take longer. This guy’s calculations reckon we’d lose about 1 degree per 12 hours. January’s global average temperature was around 13°, so that’d be 6 and a half days. July last year it was 17°, so that’d be a whole 8 and a half days. It’s going to be more like a week.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Expanding a little on the last part, Earth’s orbital velocity is about 29.8 km/s so that’s the speed at which we would suddenly be leaving the former location of the solar system in a direction that depends on what time of year it happened. Regardless of direction though, the escape velocity of the Milky Way around where we are is about 544 km/s so there’s no way we’d be leaving the galaxy. On the other hand the plane of the galaxy is only about 6 degrees off from the galactic center at the moment, so if this happened at the right time of year (don’t know when that is) we could launch somewhat towards the core. We would not however get very close to it because the sun’s own orbital velocity is about 230 km/s so we’d still be in close to the same galactic orbit overall, just potentially a bit more eccentric.

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Do you think Jupiter would take over as our center of the solar system? Hopefully it doesn’t sling us into deep space or another planet

              • Klear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                It wouldn’t sling us into deep space because we are in deep space and will continue to be in deep space.

                • burgersc12@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I meant like away from the rest of our planets. Space= above earth. Deep space= beyond solar system. No one considers earth space

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    And now for the segue into a shower thought - so the first thing night side would notice is the Moon disappearing (if it’s in the night sky), but after that, how long before effects begin to suggest something is seriously wrong on the day side. Something tells me it will be sooner than the morning.

    • TaTTe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d assume after 8 minutes the people on the day side would notice and all media would blow up, so hopefully you’d be asleep and wouldn’t have to worry :)